It is in the Following that You Face the Cross

I have been left with an enduring thought these past couple of days, a thought which came from yesterday’s Gospel in which Jesus instructs his disciples that if they follow him, they will face the cross.

I would suspect that if Jesus were to appear, most of us would answer his invitation to follow with an enthusiastic “Yes.” We wouldn’t want, would we, to leave the impression before him of a lukewarm response. He tells us though that come we may, but we will face the cross quickly.

In this Sunday’s Gospel from Mark we hear essentially of the same. Immediately after Jesus is baptized by John in the Jordan and his glory as the Son of God is revealed by the Father’s voice, he is driven into the desert where he was tested.

Driven are told. Tested among wild beasts…. but supported by angels.

It is in the following that we face the cross. It is not in blazing our own trail or establishing our own way. Whatever difficulties we may experience in our own trail-blazing, they are never the cross because more often than not the difficulties experienced by our stubbornness in finding our own way lead to dead ends if not death itself – spiritual death.

The cross that we will experience in following Jesus’ beckoning always leads to life, new life. It is a gate, a door, a portal through which we walk, never alone but always accompanied — yes, led through — by Christ himself. And his doors lead to the richness of life.

Let us not give pause to the experience of the cross; let us not in fear turn back or hesitate to follow.

Let us live Lent this year so as to experience the portal to eternal life.

Posted in Dogmatic Theology, Spirituality | Comments Off on It is in the Following that You Face the Cross

USCCB’s Updated Response to the HHS Mandate

Here is a link to a short video released by the Unites States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Please take 90 seconds to view it and then continue to demand a repeal of the HHS mandate that violates religious liberty and freedom of conscience in our country.

http://bcove.me/8701wf7v

Here is a copy of a letter regarding this released two days ago from Cardinal Dolan and Bishop Lori.

Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan, Archbishop of New York

President

February 22, 2012

Dear Brother Bishops,

Since we last wrote to you concerning the critical efforts we are undertaking together to protect religious freedom in our beloved country, many of you have requested that we write once more to update you on the situation and to again request the assistance of all the faithful in this important work. We are happy to do so now.

First, we wish to express our heartfelt appreciation to you, and to all our sisters and brothers in Christ, for the remarkable witness of our unity in faith and strength of conviction during this past month. We have made our voices heard, and we will not cease from doing so until religious freedom is restored.

As we know, on January 20, the Department of Health and Human Services announced a decision to issue final regulations that would force practically all employers, including many religious institutions, to pay for abortion inducing drugs, sterilizations, and contraception. The regulations would provide no protections for our great institutions—such as Catholic charities, hospitals, and universities—or for the individual faithful in the marketplace. The regulations struck at the heart of our fundamental right to religious liberty, which affects our ability to serve those outside our faith community.

Since January 20, the reaction was immediate and sustained. We came together, joined by people of every creed and political persuasion, to make one thing resoundingly clear: we stand united against any attempt to deny or weaken the right to religious liberty upon which our country was founded.

On Friday, February 10, the Administration issued the final rules. By their very terms, the rules were reaffirmed “without change.” The mandate to provide the illicit services remains.

The exceedingly narrow exemption for churches remains. Despite the outcry, all the threats to religious liberty posed by the initial rules remain.

Religious freedom is a fundamental right of all. This right does not depend on any government’s decision to grant it: it is God-given, and just societies recognize and respect its free exercise. The free exercise of religion extends well beyond the freedom of worship. It also forbids government from forcing people or groups to violate their most deeply held religious convictions, and from interfering in the internal affairs of religious organizations.

Recent actions by the Administration have attempted to reduce this free exercise to a “privilege” arbitrarily granted by the government as a mere exemption from an allencompassing, extreme form of secularism. The exemption is too narrowly defined, because it does not exempt most non-profit religious employers, the religiously affiliated insurer, the selfinsured employer, the for-profit religious employer, or other private businesses owned and operated by people who rightly object to paying for abortion inducing drugs, sterilization, and contraception. And because it is instituted only by executive whim, even this unduly narrow exemption can be taken away easily.

In the United States, religious liberty does not depend on the benevolence of who is regulating us. It is our “first freedom” and respect for it must be broad and inclusive—not narrow and exclusive. Catholics and other people of faith and good will are not second class citizens. And it is not for the government to decide which of our ministries is “religious enough” to warrant religious freedom protection.

This is not just about contraception, abortion-causing drugs, and sterilization—although all should recognize the injustices involved in making them part of a universal mandated health care program. It is not about Republicans or Democrats, conservatives or liberals. It is about people of faith. This is first and foremost a matter of religious liberty for all. If the government can, for example, tell Catholics that they cannot be in the insurance business today without violating their religious convictions, where does it end? This violates the constitutional limits on our government, and the basic rights upon which our country was founded.

Much remains to be done. We cannot rest when faced with so grave a threat to the religious liberty for which our parents and grandparents fought. In this moment in history we must work diligently to preserve religious liberty and to remove all threats to the practice of our faith in the public square. This is our heritage as Americans. President Obama should rescind the mandate, or at the very least, provide full and effective measures to protect religious liberty and conscience.

Above all, dear brothers, we rely on the help of the Lord in this important struggle. We all need to act now by contacting our legislators in support of the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act, which can be done through our action alert on www.usccb.org/conscience.

We invite you to share the contents of this letter with the faithful of your diocese in whatever form, or by whatever means, you consider most suitable. Let us continue to pray for a quick and complete resolution to this and all threats to religious liberty and the exercise of our faith in our great country.

Timothy Cardinal Dolan, Archbishop of New York

President, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

Most Reverend William E. Lori, Bishop of Bridgeport

Chairman, Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty

Posted in Health Care, Politics | Comments Off on USCCB’s Updated Response to the HHS Mandate

Quote for the Day

“The truly obedient person simply does what he does for the sake of God. He takes account of nothing but genuine obedience and renders obedience reverently as if the directive came from Jesus himself.” — St. Collette, OSC

Posted in Spirituality | Comments Off on Quote for the Day

Minnesota Marriage Minute #8

Here is the eighth Minnesota Marriage Minute video on the upcoming Marriage Protection Amendment that will be on the ballot this November in Minnesota. I once again urge you to view the video, be informed and vote to protect marriage in this state.

Thank you!

Posted in Marriage and Family, Politics | Comments Off on Minnesota Marriage Minute #8

Quote for the Day

“We may be as much as nauseated in having to mingle with people of all sorts and conditions as St. Francis was with those who suffered from leprosy. Yet this is living the Gospel of love.” — Br. Brian, SSF

Posted in Spirituality | Comments Off on Quote for the Day

Congratulations, Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston!

Photo Source: Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston

The Holy Father has nominated as auxiliary bishop of Galveston-Houston, Rev. George A. Sheltz.

Bishop-elect Sheltz has been the vicar general, chancellor and moderator of the curia of the same diocese. He was born in Houston and completed his theological studies at St. Mary Seminary in Houston. Ordained a priest in 1971, he has been pastor of several parishes.

Cardinal Daniel DiNardo will now have some help in pastoring his enormous diocese.

Congratulations, Archdiocese of Houston-Galveston!

Posted in Church News | Comments Off on Congratulations, Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston!

Update #3: Has Europe Lost Its Soul? – The Infantilizaton of Culture

Chief Rabbi Lord Jonathon Sacks, in his address at the Gregorian (see previous posts) commented on how consumerism saps the moral strength of a culture, for it brings about a society obsessed with money. He said,

“When money rules, we remember the price of things and forget the value of things, and that is dangerous.”

He suggests that a consumerist society is a highly efficient system for the creation and distribution of unhappiness, and then goes further and speaks of the need for inculcating impulse control in children to ensure good social adjustment by way of analogy to what he terms the “infantilization” of European culture. For Sachs, success depends on the ability to delay gratification, something a consumerist culture undermines. He questions whether our current social structures are strong enough to survive this infantilization.

I find, once again, that he brings up some food for thought. One can reflect upon one’s own experience and ask whether the economic realities with which we live have done anything to mature us. Has our attitude and behavior toward money and possessions led us to a maturity, an ability to save, to delay gratification, and to seek happiness in other realms other than economic, or has it only infantilized and enslaved us?

One might even ask whether or not our economic lives have become a source of idolatry for us…. do we worship what we can consume, or do we place all we have at the feet of God in offering?

The next and final installment in this series on Sachs’ address will be on his thoughts on how Judaism protected itself from this.

Posted in Economy | Comments Off on Update #3: Has Europe Lost Its Soul? – The Infantilizaton of Culture

Quote for the Day

“Good spirituality trusts God even when the directions are vague.” — Lester Bach, OFM Cap.

Posted in Spirituality | Comments Off on Quote for the Day

Cardinal Dolan the Next Pope?!

Talk about making an impression! The Italian newspaper, Il Messaggero is reporting today that there is talk about the town that newly-made Cardinal Dolan is one of the papabili, that is, “pope able.” Let me quote Francesca Giansoldati in today’s edition of that paper (my translation of the Italian original):

The Consistory, among the 22 cardinals comes forth a new papabile: the American Dolan

Until yesterday at the Vatican there remained the unwritten rule that American cardinals were hardly electable in a conclave, not so much because of their human or pastoral profile, but because of their nationality. John Allen, among the most authoritative voices on the American Catholicism, said that for the same reason it would be difficult for a Secretary General of the United Nations to be an American because it would entrust too much superpower to a single nation. We figured the same for the Pope.

Thus, a similar attitude to not take into consideration a North American as pope possibles had remained unscathed until the other day when the new cardinal Timothy Dolan, Archbishop of New York, positively struck all the 133 cardinals present at the closed door summit with the Pope. Even Benedict XVI before such a speech, so refreshing and of strong impact, couldn’t help but publicly complement him, using unusual adjectives: “An enthusiastic, joyful and profound demeanor.”

In effect the discourse that the cardinals had heard, even though delivered in very “primitive” Italian for which Dolan excused himself at the beginning, captured the attention of all, effectively combining a theological reflection on the state of things while speaking in common fashion using personal examples, humorously going back and forth with memories, citing romances and even a film, The Way. ……

Among the 22 cardinals, Dolan stood out because of his size. He is very tall and stout but with effect always smiling. And this is sufficient to transform him into a papabile.

 Kind of hard to immagine…. an American pope. What is certain is Dolan is making an international impression, and if Giansoldati’s description is accurate, he has made a positive impression on the whole college of cardinals. Just the fact that he was asked to give this address yesterday is indicative of the attention he is getting from the Holy Father.

If you read Italian, log on to: www.ilmessaggero.it/articolo.php?id=181960&sez=HOME_NELMONDO

Posted in Church News | Comments Off on Cardinal Dolan the Next Pope?!

Congratulations, Cardinals O’Brien and Dolan!

Earlier today, Edwin O’Brien and Timothy Dolan were given the red hat and made cardinals of the Church. Their admittance to the Pope’s senate makes the United States the second largest contingent in the college of cardinals, after the Italians.

In case you are interested, Cardinal Dolan is now cardinal-priest of the church of Our Lady of Guadalupe on Monte Mario, and Cardinal O’Brien is the cardinal-deacon of the church of St. Sebastian on the Palatine, both churches in Rome. Every cardinal has a church in Rome to which they are assigned. This does not mean they no longer have their other assignments i.e., Cardinal Dolan is still the Archbishop of New York and Cardinal O’Brien is still Pro-Grand Master of the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem, but traditionally cardinals have a Roman church also which binds them to the diocese of Rome.

It is said that the Holy Father is noticeably slowing down. He, for instance, came down the center aisle of St. Peter’s today on a wheeled platform rather than walking. He has cut back his scheduled activities even though he is planning a trip to Cuba and Mexico later this year. I learned also that he used a streamlined ceremony today for the installation of the cardinals. We pray for his continued health and as always, ad moltos annos!

Congratulations, Cardinals O’Brien and Dolan!

Posted in Church History | Comments Off on Congratulations, Cardinals O’Brien and Dolan!

Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan’s Address to the Holy Father and the College of Cardinals

Image source: www.patheos.com

Soon-t0-be Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan, Archbishop of New York, was given honor of addressing the Holy Father and the cardinals of the Church in their day of preparation for the consistory which will elevate Dolan and others as cardinals. This address is normally reserved for a more senior cardinal, so Dolan’s selection in illustrative, perhaps, of his favor with the Pope and his brother cardinals. Here is a transcript of his words (original was Italian): 

The Announcement of the Gospel Today, Between missio ad gentes and the New Evangelization

Holy Father, Cardinal Sodano, my brothers in Christ:
Sia lodato Gesu Cristo!

It is as old as the final mandate of Jesus, “Go, teach all nations!,” yet as fresh as God’s Holy Word proclaimed at our own Mass this morning.

I speak of the sacred duty of evangelization. It is “ever ancient, ever new.” The how of it, the when of it, the where of it, may change, but the charge remains constant, as does the message and inspiration, “Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow.”

We gather in the caput mundi, evangelized by Peter and Paul themselves, in the city from where the successors of St. Peter “sent out” evangelizers to present the saving Person, message, and invitation that is at the heart of evangelization: throughout Europe, to the “new world” in the “era of discovery,” to Africa and Asia in recent centuries.

We gather near the basilica where the evangelical fervor of the Church was expanded during the Second Vatican Council, and near the tomb of the Blessed Pontiff who made the New Evangelization a household word.

We gather grateful for the fraternal company of a pastor who has made the challenge of the new evangelization almost a daily message.

Yes, we gather as missionaries, as evangelizers.

We hail the teaching of the Second Vatican Council, especially found in Lumen Gentium, Gaudium et Spes, and Ad Gentes, that refines the Church’s understanding of her evangelical duty, defining the entire Church as missionary, that all Christians, by reason of baptism, confirmation, and Eucharist, are evangelizers.

Yes, the Council reaffirmed, especially in Ad Gentes, there are explicit missionaries, sent to lands and peoples who have never heard the very Name by which all are saved, but also that no Christian is exempt from the duty of witnessing to Jesus and offering His invitation to others in his own day-to-day life.

Thus, mission became central to the life of every local church, to every believer. The context of mission shifted not only in a geographical sense, but in a theological sense, as mission applied not only to unbelievers but to believers, and some thoughtful people began to wonder if such a providential expansion of the concept of evangelization unintentionally diluted the emphasis of mission ad gentes.

Blessed John Paul II developed this fresh understanding, speaking of evangelizing cultures, since the engagement between faith and culture supplanted the relationship between church and state dominant prior to the Council, and included in this task the re-evangelizing of cultures that had once been the very engine of gospel values. The New Evangelization became the dare to apply the invitation of Jesus to conversion of heart not only ad extra but ad intra, to believers and cultures where the salt of the gospel had lost its tang. Thus, the missio is not only to New Guinea but to New York.

In Redemptoris Missio, #33, he elaborated upon this, noting primary evangelization — the preaching of Jesus to lands and people unaware of His saving message — the New Evangelization — the rekindling of faith in persons and cultures where it has grown lackluster — and the pastoral care of those daily living as believers.

We of course acknowledge that there can be no opposition between the missio ad gentes and the New Evangelization. It is not an “either-or” but a “both-and” proposition. The New Evangelization generates enthusiastic missionaries; those in the apostolate of the missio ad gentes require themselves to be constantly evangelized anew.

Even in the New Testament, to the very generation who had the missio ad gentes given by the Master at His ascension still ringing in their ears, Paul had to remind them to “stir into flame” the gift of faith given them, certainly an early instance of the New Evangelization.

And, just recently, in the inspirational Synod in Africa, we heard our brothers from the very lands radiant with the fruits of the missio ad gentes report that those now in the second and third generation after the initial missionary zeal already stand in need of the New Evangelization.

The acclaimed American missionary and TV evangelist, Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen, commented, “Our Lord’s first word to His disciples was ‘come!’ His last word was ‘go!’ You can’t ‘go’ unless you’ve first ‘come’ to Him.”

A towering challenge to both the missio ad gentes and the New Evangalization today is what we call secularism. Listen to how our Pope describes it:

Secularization, which presents itself in cultures by imposing a world and
humanity without reference to Transcendence, is invading every aspect of daily life and developing a mentality in which God is effectively absent, wholly or partially, from human life and awareness. This secularization is not only an external threat to believers, but has been manifest for some time in the heart of the Church herself. It profoundly distorts the Christian faith from within, and consequently, the lifestyle and daily behavior of believers. They live in the world and are often marked, if not conditioned, by the cultural imagery that impresses contradictory and impelling models regarding the practical denial of God: there is no longer any need for God, to think of him or to return to him. Furthermore, the prevalent hedonistic and consumeristic mindset fosters in the faithful and in Pastors a tendency to superficiality and selfishness that is harmful to ecclesial life. (Benedict XVI, Address to Pontifical Council for Culture, 8.III.2008)

This secularization calls for a creative strategy of evangelization, and I want to detail seven planks of this strategy.

1. Actually, in graciously inviting me to speak on this topic, “The Announcement of the Gospel Today, between missio ad gentes and the new evangelization,” my new-brother-cardinal, His Eminence, the Secretary of State, asked me to put in into the context of secularism, hinting that my home archdiocese of New York might be the “capital of a secular culture.”

As I trust my friend and new-brother-cardinal, Edwin O’Brien — who grew up in New York — will agree, New York — without denying its dramatic evidence of graphic secularism — is also a very religious city.

There one finds, even among groups usually identified as materialistic — the media, entertainment, business, politics, artists, writers — an undeniable openness to the divine!

The cardinals who serve Jesus and His Church universal on the Roman Curia may recall the address Pope Benedict gave them at Christmas two years ago when he celebrated this innate openness to the divine obvious even in those who boast of their secularism:

We as believers, must have at heart even those people who consider themselves agnostics or atheists. When we speak of a new evangelization these people are perhaps taken aback. They do not want to see themselves as an object of mission or to give up their freedom of thought and will. Yet the question of God remains present even for them. As the first step of evangelization we must seek to keep this quest alive; we must be concerned that human beings do not set aside the question of God, but rather see it as an essential question for their lives. We must make sure that they are open to this question and to the yearning concealed within. I think that today too the Church should open a sort of “Court of the Gentiles” in which people might in some way latch on to God, without knowing him and before gaining access to his mystery, at whose service the inner life of the Church stands.

This is my first point: we believe with the philosophers and poets of old, who never had the benefit of revelation, that even a person who brags about being secular and is dismissive of religion, has within an undeniable spark of interest in the beyond, and recognizes that humanity and creation is a dismal riddle without the concept of some kind of creator.

A movie popular at home now is The Way, starring a popular actor, Martin Sheen. Perhaps you have seen it. He plays a grieving father whose estranged son dies while walking the Camino di Santiago di Campostella in Spain. The father decides, in his grief, to complete the pilgrimage in place of his dead son. He is an icon of a secular man: self-satisfied, dismissive of God and religion, calling himself a “former Catholic,” cynical about faith . . . but yet unable to deny within him an irrepressible interest in the transcendent, a thirst for something — no, Someone — more, which grows on the way.

Yes, to borrow the report of the apostles to Jesus from last Sunday’s gospel, “All the people are looking for you!”

They still are . . .

2. . . . and, my second point, this fact gives us immense confidence and courage in the sacred task of mission and New Evangelization.

“Be not afraid,” we’re told, is the most repeated exhortation in the Bible.

After the Council, the good news was that triumphalism in the Church was dead.

The bad news was that, so was confidence!

We are convinced, confident, and courageous in the New Evangelization because of the power of the Person sending us on mission — who happens to be the second Person of the Most Blessed Trinity – because of the truth of the message, and the deep down openness in even the most secularized of people to the divine.

Confident, yes!

Triumphant, never!

What keeps us from the swagger and arrogance of triumphalism is a recognition of what Pope Paul VI taught in Evangelii Nuntiandi: the Church herself needs evangelization!

This gives us humility as we confess that Nemo dat quod not habet, that the Church has a deep need for the interior conversion that is at the marrow of the call to evangelization.

3. A third necessary ingredient in the recipe of effective mission is that God does not satisfy the thirst of the human heart with a proposition, but with a Person, whose name is Jesus.

The invitation implicit in the Missio ad gentes and the New Evangelization is not to a doctrine but to know, love, and serve — not a something, but a Someone.

When you began your ministry as successor of St. Peter, Holy Father, you invited us to friendship with Jesus, which is the way you defined sanctity.

There it is . . . love of a Person, a relationship at the root of out faith.

As St. Augustine writes, “Ex una sane doctrina impressam fidem credentium cordibus singulorum qui hoc idem credunt verissime dicimus, sed aliud sunt ea quae creduntur, aliud fides qua creduntur” (De Trinitate, XIII, 2.5)

4. Yes, and here’s my fourth point, but this Person, Jesus, tells us He is the truth.

So, our mission has a substance, a content, and this twentieth anniversary of the Catechism, the approaching fiftieth anniversary of the Council, and the upcoming Year of Faith charge us to combat catechetical illiteracy.

True enough, the New Evangalization is urgent because secularism has often choked the seed of faith; but that choking was sadly made easy because so many believers really had no adequate knowledge or grasp of the wisdom, beauty, and coherence of the Truth.

Cardinal George Pell has observed that “it’s not so much that our people have lost their faith, but that they barely had it to begin with; and, if they did, it was so vapid that it was easily taken away.”

So did Cardinal Avery Dulles call for neo-apologetics, rooted not in dull polemics but in the Truth that has a name, Jesus.

So did Blessed John Newman, upon reception of his own biglietto nominating him a cardinal warn again of what he constantly called a dangerous liberalism in religion: “. . . the belief that there is no objective truth in religion, that one creed is as good as another . . . Revealed religion is not a truth, but a sentiment, a taste . . . ”

And, just as Jesus tells us “I am the Truth,” He also describes Himself as “the Way, and the Life.”

The Way of Jesus is in and through His Church, a holy mother who imparts to us His Life.

“For what would I ever know of Him without her?” asks De Lubac, referring to the intimate identification of Jesus and His Church.

Thus, our mission, the New Evangelization, has essential catechetical and ecclesial dimensions.

This impels us to think about Church in a fresh way: to think of the Church as a mission. As John Paul II taught in Redemptoris Missio, the Church does not “have a mission,” as if “mission” were one of many things the Church does. No, the Church is a mission, and each of us who names Jesus as Lord and Savior should measure ourselves by our mission-effectiveness.

Over the fifty years since the convocation of the Council, we have seen the Church pass through the last stages of the Counter-Reformation and rediscover itself as a missionary enterprise. In some venues, this has meant a new discovery of the Gospel. In once-catechized lands, it has meant a re-evangelization that sets out from the shallow waters of institutional maintenance, and as John Paul II instructed us in Novo Millennio Ineunte, puts out “into the deep” for a catch.

In many of the countries represented in this college, the ambient public culture once transmitted the Gospel, but does so no more. In those circumstances, the proclamation of the Gospel — the deliberate invitation to enter into friendship with the Lord Jesus — must be at the very center of the Catholic life of all of our people. But in all circumstances, the Second Vatican Council and the two great popes who have given it an authoritative interpretation are urging us to call our people to think of themselves as missionaries and evangelists.

5. When I was a new seminarian at the North American College here in Rome, all the first-year men from all the Roman theological universities were invited to a Mass at St. Peter’s with the Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy, Cardinal John Wright, as celebrant and homilist.

We thought he would give us a cerebral homily. But he began by asking, “Seminarians: do me and the Church a big favor. When you walk the streets of Rome, smile!”

So, point five: the missionary, the evangelist, must be a person of joy.

“Joy is the infallible sign of God’s presence,” claims Leon Bloy.

When I became Archbishop of New York, a priest old me, “You better stop smiling when you walk the streets of Manhattan, or you’ll be arrested!”

A man dying of AIDS at the Gift of Peace Hospice, administered by the Missionaries of Charity in Cardinal Donald Wuerl’s Archdiocese of Washington, asked for baptism. When the priest asked for an expression of faith, the dying man whispered, “All I know is that I’m unhappy, and these sisters are very happy, even when I curse them and spit on them. Yesterday I finally asked them why they were so happy. They replied ‘Jesus.’ I want this Jesus so I can finally be happy.

A genuine act of faith, right?

The New Evangelization is accomplished with a smile, not a frown.

The missio ad gentes is all about a yes to everything decent, good, true, beautiful and noble in the human person.

The Church is about a yes!, not a no!

6. And, next-to-last point, the New Evangelization is about love.

Recently, our brother John Thomas Kattrukudiyil, the Bishop of Itanagar, in the northeast corner of India, was asked to explain the tremendous growth of the Church in his diocese, registering over 10,000 adult converts a year.

“Because we present God as a loving father, and because people see the Church loving them.” he replied.

Not a nebulous love, he went on, but a love incarnate in wonderful schools for all children, clinics for the sick, homes for the elderly, centers for orphans, food for the hungry.

In New York, the heart of the most hardened secularist softens when visiting one of our inner-city Catholic schools. When one of our benefactors, who described himself as an agnostic, asked Sister Michelle why, at her age, with painful arthritic knees, she continued to serve at one of these struggling but excellent poor schools, she answered, “Because God loves me, and I love Him, and I want these children to discover this love.”

7. Joy, love . . . and, last point . . . sorry to bring it up, . . . but blood.

Tomorrow, twenty-two of us will hear what most of you have heard before:

“To the praise of God, and the honor of the Apostolic See
receive the red biretta, the sign of the cardinal’s dignity;
and know that you must be willing to conduct yourselves with fortitude
even to the shedding of your blood:
for the growth of the Christian faith,
the peace and tranquility of the People of God,
and the freedom and spread of the Holy Roman Church.”

Holy Father,can you omit “to the shedding of your blood” when you present me with the biretta?

Of course not! We are but “scarlet audio-visual aids” for all of our brothers and sisters also called to be ready to suffer and die for Jesus.

It was Pope Paul VI who noted wisely that people today learn more from “witness than from words,” and the supreme witness is martyrdom.

Sadly, today we have martyrs in abundance.

Thank you, Holy Father, for so often reminding us of those today suffering persecution for their faith throughout the world.

Thank you, Cardinal Koch, for calling the Church to an annual “day of solidarity” with those persecuted for the sake of the gospel, and for inviting our ecumenical and inter-religious partners to an “ecumenism of martyrdom.”

While we cry for today’s martyrs; while we love them, pray with and for them; while we vigorously advocate on their behalf; we are also very proud of them, brag about them, and trumpet their supreme witness to the world.

They spark the missio ad gentes and New Evangelization.

A young man in New York tells me he returned to the Catholic faith of his childhood, which he had jettisoned as a teenager, because he read The Monks of Tibhirine, about Trappists martyred in Algeria fifteen years ago, and after viewing the drama about them, the French film, Of Gods and Men.

Tertullian would not be surprised.

Thank you, Holy Father and brethren, for your patience with my primitive Italian. When Cardinal Bertone asked me to give this address in Italian, I worried, because I speak Italian like a child.

But, then I recalled, that, as a newly-ordained parish priest, my first pastor said to me as I went over to school to teach the six-year old children their catechism, “Now we’ll see if all your theology sunk in, and if you can speak of the faith like a child.”

And maybe that’s a fitting place to conclude: we need to speak again as a child the eternal truth, beauty, and simplicity of Jesus and His Church.

Sia lodato Gesu Cristo!

 (source: http://cnsblog.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/cardinal-designate-dolans-address-to-pope-benedict-and-the-college-of-cardinals/)

Posted in Church News, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan’s Address to the Holy Father and the College of Cardinals

Quote for the Day

“In the intimacy of my soul I feel contented because it desires nothing but the will of God.” — St. Veronica Giuliani, OSC

Posted in Spirituality | Comments Off on Quote for the Day

Minnesota Marriage Minute #7

Here is the seventh video affirming marriage and giving good explanation why marriage as a union of one man and one woman must be protected in Minnesota.

 

Posted in Marriage and Family | Comments Off on Minnesota Marriage Minute #7

Prayer for Papa Luciani’s Centenary

The 100th anniversary of Pope John Paul I’s birth is occuring later this year.  As it is celebrated in his home town in Italy, and plans for a celebration underway here in the United States (at Fordham University most probably), there is a prayer that has been written.The magazine Humilitas, I have been informed, has published it. Here it is:

PRAYER FOR THE CENTENARY

Lord, Omnipotent and eternal God, we admire the marvels that You Grace works in your children. Today we bless you for the love You have poured out on Your Servant, Pope John Paul I, by calling him to life, to Your friendship, to serve You as pastor and as Your Vicar for the Universal Church. As we inaugurate the centenary year that recalls the history of his life in the light of your Providence, which guides men and events toward the encounter with You, from the testimony of life of John Paul I, a living image of Jesus, the Good Shepherd, help us to draw on those gifts that make us your children and disciples of Christ: from his faith and serenity we want to learn to abandon ourselves to You with the heart of a child; from his generosity, we want to learn to say “Yes” to everything You ask of us; from his love for the simple and the little ones, we want to learn to serve everyone who needs us. Father in Heaven, we humbly ask you to glorify in your Church Your Servant John Paul I, so that, through his intercession and his example, we may all draw on and give, with humility and simplicity, the light and love that radiate from You. Through Christ out Lord. Amen.

Let us pray that Papa Luciani’s cause of beatification advance with haste so that we might one day soon witness too his canonization as a Saint.

Posted in Papa Luciani (Pope John Paul I) | Comments Off on Prayer for Papa Luciani’s Centenary

Muddy Thinking

I find it difficult listen to “muddy thinking,” you know, the kind of reasoning that fails in its premises, confused in its logic, disordered in its choices, and dominated by passions.

Muddy thinking is what is occuring in our society today about marriage.

Here is my take on the whole issue of trying to equate same-sex relationships with marriage.

Those pushing the “same-sex marriage” laws in state legislatures throughout the country (indeed in many other nations of the world) are using the civil rights argument. They argue that one should be able to establish a sexual relationship with whomever – male or female – and obtain the state’s, and society’s sanction and support. This  includes most importantly the legal rights afforded marriage. To restrict marriage to only heterosexual persons is a violation of the civil rights of homosexually oriented men and women. To support traditional marriage (one man and one woman) is considered intolerance and homophobism, and the struggle to obtain marriage rights is similar to the 1960s civil rights movement for racial equality.

The problem with their reasoning, their muddy thinking, lies in the premise that it is a civil rights issue. It isn’t. The issue, in part, has to do with the state’s role in regulating sexual behavior and defining family structure.

Now some will say that the state has no right to do either. This too is muddy thinking. The state has always, from the beginning of history, establish laws and norms regulating and sanctioning both sexual behavior and family life.

The fight that is on now has to do with just that, and secondly with the question of whether society (you and I) dare to assume the authority to define as we wish marriage and family. Are we the ultimate authority of marriage? Can we make it whatever we will?

Careful before you respond. Some will say, “Yes. This  is what we must do as a society. We must define what will be marriage.” To those, I would ask, “What then of future challenges to marriage definition? Can you refuse such to recognize the relationship between a 30 year old and a 12 year old as marriage if they are in love and involved sexually? Many people are deeply loving to their pets. Many people in fact are amorous with them. Can you refuse to recognize as a marriage such a relationship if a man or woman wanted to make it so? And if you do refuse, on what grounds and to what authority do you appeal in making the refusal? On what grounds do we continue to refuse to permit a man to have several wives, or a woman to have several husbands concurrently?”

Society has always defined marriage as a relationship between a man and a woman in which sexual intimacy occurs and children are reared. Society has always appealed to a higher authority on which it grounded its definition. Society has always recognized something we now call natural law to which it tried to adhere and support. Society has always known that children are best raised in a family inclusive of a man and a woman. This is not something being pulled out of thin air nor prejudicial persecution or homophobia.

The concerted effort to recognize same-sex relationships as marriage is not a matter of civil rights. Opposing changing the definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman is not homophobic. 

Protecting marriage is a matter of the state’s interests in promoting that which is in accordance with natural law, the value of sexual difference, social stability and a recognition that there is a larger authority to which we need listen, an authority that is part and parcel of human nature — the natural law as many would say.

This is far too huge of an issue to be quiet about. We must protect marriage. We have an opportunity to do so in Minnesota this November. Go to the polls and cast your vote to protect marriage as the union of one man and one woman. Pray that “muddy thinking” not confuse the hearts and minds of the many.

Posted in Marriage and Family | Comments Off on Muddy Thinking