St. Aidan’s Catholic Church
Ellendale, Minnesota
The Church’s sole and primary purpose in her social doctrine is helping mankind to achieve salvation. The Church has the right to be a teacher of the truth of faith: the truth not only of dogma but also of morals whose source lies in human nature itself and the Gospel. The right of the Church is also her duty for to fail to exercise this right would be a denial of herself and her fidelity to Jesus Christ. Because of the public relevance of the Gospel and faith and because of the corruption of injustice in the public sphere, the Church cannot remain indifferent to social matters. The Church always then has the right and the duty to speak out about moral principles. even in the social order, and to render judgments on human affairs to the extent that they are required by the fundamental rights of the human person or to the salvation of souls.
For a thorough discussion of this topic, refer to the Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, nos. 66-71.
“Without Jesus, we are just five loaves and two fish.” – Deacon Gerry Trocinski
Met the “World Guy” yesterday, Erik Bendl and his dog Nice in Dresbach, Minnesota. He is from Louisville, Kentucky and spends months during the year walking from state to state raising awareness of diabetes in our country. His mom died in her early 50s with the disease, and after some major changes in his own life, he “lost everything and gained the world” as he said. Thus, he travels pushing a seventy pound, six foot tall, inflated canvas globe down the road as he walks and talks to whomever he meets and will speak with him. He does so to encourage everyone to “Love yourself and take a walk.” He accepts donations but seems to prefer you donate to whichever diabetes foundation or organization you wish, and emphasizes his main hope is people become more active and more aware of the realities of diabetes.
His cause is dear to my heart as one of my sisters also died at a young age from this disease.
Had the pleasure of buying him supper and listening to his story for about an hour.
You can follow his travels and his thoughts at www.worldguy.org
Good luck, Erik! Hope you pass by again someday.
“We have nothing to fear when we can say resolutely, even without feelings: Long live Jesus!” – St. Padre Pio, OFM Cap.
Political authority is founded on the social nature of the human person. Implied in this is the reality that all political authority has God as its author. Political authority is a necessary, positive and an irreplaceable component of civil life. This authority must guarantee an ordered and upright community life that fosters the freedom of individuals and groups, disciplines and orients this freedom, and respects the independence of the individual in order to attain the common good.
Political authority must be guided by moral law. Without such guidance, it loses its dignity. God is the first source and the final end of political authority understood in this way. Cut off from God, political authority ultimately disintegrates for without him the collective moral conscience clouds and skepticism casts doubt on the basic moral law.
Citizens are not obligated in conscience to follow the prescriptions of civil authority if such prescriptions are contrary to the demands of the moral order, to the fundamental rights of persons or to the teachings of the Gospel. It is a grave duty of conscience not to cooperate, not even formally, with civil legislation that is contrary to the Law of God. One also has the right to resist, both passively and actively, such legislation.
For a more detailed discussion of this topic, refer to the Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, nos. 393-401.
“God’s power creates us, his wisdom governs us, his mercy saves us.” – St. Crispin of Viterbo, OFM Cap.
Ran across a great description of orthodoxy today, written by Fr. John Hardon. Here is what he says:
“As a mark of orthodoxy, the Church’s catholicity is part of a mysterious paradox whereby the same essential faith and worship are held and practiced by a bewildering variety of peoples, separated geographically across the globe, culturally across the range of mankind, and historically across the centuries.”
I don’t mind being called orthodox. I think it is my obligation as a deacon, a cleric in the Church, to be orthodox. You deserve nothing less than that from any deacon or priest or bishop. It is the vocation of the ordained to teach the faith with fidelity to Divine Revelation, the living Tradition, and the Magisterium.
What I do mind is being labeled a “conservative” or a “liberal” when it comes to theological things or to the practice of my faith. I especially dislike either label applied to me when I try to express my political views. I am both conservative and liberal if you must use these descriptors and if you use those words in their true sense. I conserve what is true and handed on to me so as to hand on to you what I have been given and I must liberally, freely, offer the Gospel to the world.
I love Fr. Hardon’s description of orthodoxy. It expresses the aggiornamento sought by the Council Fathers at Vatican II. It expresses nicely an embrace of the world’s diversity in the preaching of Jesus Christ in all fidelity to the faith of our fathers, so many of whom have given their lives for the Church.
Blessed Pope John Paul II wrote that reception of the faith and living it out faithfully is not a matter of being spoon fed what to believe and how to live, nor is it a matter of defining for oneself what of the patrimony of faith we will believe and accept as truth. Orthodoxy, instead, is an embrace of the truth, of the faith, of the person of Jesus and in doing so wrestling with living in his presence and in obedience to his commands in the particular circumstances of our lives. In other words, we must live the faith, participate in its articulation and expression. This requires a strong heart and a clear mind. It demands a struggle to be a part of it all…. not just passive recipients…. not just defining for ourselves the truth…. but a ongoing discernment of the expression of faith in the modern world.
What a wonderful way to live in today’s world!
Yesterday morning, Cardinal Virgilio Noe died. Most of you are probably unaware of him, as he was always in the background, so to speak, despite being in numerous photographs and videos of Pope Paul VI, John Paul I, and John Paul II.
Cardinal Noe was Msgr. Noe back in 1978 when I met and spoke briefly to him. He is the one who assigned me the task of bearing the cross for Pope John Paul I during his installation Mass. He was “in charge” one could certainly say of the papal ceremonies. Always had a military style closely cropped haircut. I sense he was a gentle soul underneath his demeanor when conducting his duties.
I remember being glad he was finally ordained a bishop, and later made a cardinal. To my knowledge, he remained in the Vatican throughout his years as bishop.
May he rest in peace.
I have been slowly getting more and more information about the tragedy over in Norway over the weekend, apparently the work of one man.
Frankly, I have been too speechless to write a post about it.
Despite what may in future reports of the secular press be seen as a end result of “Christian fundamentalism,” anyone with any brains knows Christianity has nothing to do with such evil actions. Satan does though. So too does a mind confused and disordered by lies and distortions.
Let us pray for all involved.
I read a delightful post over at The Crescat entitled “comparing the costs of families….” which she wrote last Friday. She argues that we need to recognize our mutual responsibilities within our families, especially our aging members, and as family address those needs.
She states that the national average cost per year in nursing homes to be $61,320 according to MetLife. She suggest that adjustments to one’s life and home to accomodate an aging parent probably for most would not exceed $61,320. She also suggests that the traditional family structure of multi-generations within the household results in a shared responsibility and renders the “burdens” equitably.
She then says, “Unfortunately, thanks to our advancements and entitlements, no one has to be responsible for anyone else, much less ourselves. Women on the pill don’t have babies to grow up and care for them when they are old. Men don’t have to be fathers. Families divorce and split apart on a whim. All the while the elderly population grows and the birth rate lessens. The answer is not a new tax plan with revised spending and budgets. The answer is not more wasteful government spending and subsidies. The answer is family.”
She has a point.
“The more one loves, the less one wants from others.” — Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen
Catholic social doctrine asserts that the human person is the foundation and purpose of politics. Humans naturally social and political, and thus social life is not something that is extra or added to us. Politics originates in the very nature of the human nature, and even more pointedly, in the very nature of conscience and its obedience to the moral order which orients humanity toward just solutions to problems between individuals, social groups, and between States.
Politics is inherent to human existence and exists to achieve the full growth of each of its members who are called to cooperate in the attainment of that common good under the influence of the dictates of conscience which directs us to that which is true and good.
We are joined to each other in a political community, which unites us as a people, and gives us a certain autonomy at the level of personal existence and goals. For every people, there is generally a corresponding nation; yet we know that within nations there exist minorities who may not share completely with the majority shared life and values. The Church maintains that such minorities retain rights and duties, most basically the right to exist, the right to culture and language, and the right to religious belief and worship.
For more discussion of this topic, refer to the Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, nos. 384-387.
One of the most common clinical presentations in my office is addiction in a person’s life. This can take many forms ranging from the patient being personally addicted to substances such as alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, cocaine, meth or a score of other chemicals or to behaviors such as gambling and sex, all the way to the individual who has grown up with an addicted parent, sibling or another important person and whose life has been significantly impacted.
It is extraordinarily common, folks.
I respect addictions. I highly respect them. I take them seriously, and I do whatever I can to know them well, for to know them is to respect them and their power to destroy.
I sometimes wonder if addictions are not one of Satan’s most powerful tools. They (he) can take a good man/woman and leave him in shambles, with a disordered life. The effects are permanent and even in recovery the greatest threat to continued sane, sober life is the belief that one has conquered the addiction. An addict can only hope for health and sanity by remembering where he has been, and having a deep respect for the power of the addiction, and an irresolute trust in God’s ability to free him.
God is the best defense against Satan and his genius.
I am thinking of this because we all have known someone, either personally or via the national news, who had been someone of greatness only to fall mightily into ruin because they have not respected the lasting power of their addiction.
I want to end these thoughts with an explicit statement of what I hope is implied, i.e., we all must have compassion for the addict, not condemnation or judgment. Their world when actively addicted is a place where they can survive only by construction of a complex set of delusions (unreal evaluations of what is true); without these, the pain is too intense, the emptiness too complete.
That is why they are in continual need of our prayers and our understanding, and our willingness to assist when the time is right.
Venerable Matt Talbot, pray for all those suffering from addictions.